Hacking at the leaves of evil

Greg Stier:

It seems to me that more and more Christians are hacking at the leaves of evil and forgetting to strike at the root. We are getting entranced by good causes that oftentimes leave the root, the real source of the problem, untouched. While slashing at leaves can be impressive and leave piles of leafy accomplishment if the root is untouched the hacking is simply a pruning that will produce more leaves to hack at the end of the day.

Let me put it plainly, Jesus told us to “Go into all the world and make disciples of all nations” not “Go into all the world to eradicate poverty and social injustices.” Because Jesus knew that these kinds of efforts by themselves were at best hacking at the leaves of evil.

Jesus understood that the real problem with the world was not physical. It wasn’t a lack of food or shelter or water. THE REAL PROBLEM WAS A LACK OF JESUS!!!

Whereas I think it’s clear lack of food etc. are real problems (physical needs do matter, or why would Jesus heal and feed people?), I think we often prioritise dealing with them, forgetting that it’s the gospel that transforms people, not laws, governments, or even charities. What’s the best way to help a society where there’s poverty? Preach the gospel to both rich and poor – and take care of the poor physically while you’re at it. A very good read, particularly the stuff on Zacchaeus. (Via Mark.)

Divine design is an ever spreading goodness

I love it when Dave Bish writes like this:

In chapter 2 [of Genesis] we take a different camera angle. We see the formless and empty wilderness. Then two things happen. A garden is planted in the east, on Mount Eden – from which rivers flow to spread life to the world. And in view of the commission of the previous chapter, this garden will be extended to fill the whole world.

Lovely biblical theology. Enjoy the last paragraph particularly.

Top 10 Reasons NOT to write songs for your Church

My favourite reason: “There are so many great songwriters out there already, no one needs your songs”.

God has so ordered his church that each congregation will go through the same struggles in the same way, at the same time, causing those events to sync up with Chris Tomlin’s recording schedule in order to deliver the CD at just the right time for your congregation to learn. That’s what the doctrine of God’s sovereignty means, buddy.

This entry’s got me thinking about songwriting again!


A while back I linked to the trailer for a film I co-wrote the soundtrack for. As the link no longer works, here’s a Vimeo version. The music used was initially written for the emotional climax of the film, and given that I only wrote the music for one other scene, perhaps “co-composer” oversells my role slightly! Hope you enjoy it nonetheless, and I hope to badger the director to sell DVDs of it at some point…


People often ask me what it is about Japan that interests me. This video shows one of those reasons. The name “Hayaku” means “quickly”. (Click through to watch it on HD on Vimeo.)

Long term living

I’ve just come from the last get together with my gospel community I’ll have before leaving Brighton. We were talking about what it means to be learning and growing together, and Kath, who was helping to lead the discussion, said something about “long term living”, which she’s been writing about on her blog recently too.

Long term living is starting to invade my subconscious, starting to grip me in ways that I’ve not encountered before. Starting to make me think that it could be possible to stay in one place and be patient for a while. But what makes me skip so much? What makes me want to run away?

Have a read of Kath’s blog entry. One thing that’s struck me recently is the instantaneousness of internet communication, and the “need” to hear straight away about what’s going on. Kath writes:

I’m worried about the instant availability of everything. It’s eating away at my ability to be long term. It’s making me want more and more faster and faster. Speed of availability seems like the ultimate goal for most things in life right now.

It’s also playing havoc with my attention span. I love that we can condense thoughts into 140 characters now. A delightful medium. But what about the thoughts that require deeper insight, more explanation?

I’ve seen the same tendencies in me, and have been wondering what to do about it. Definitely need to think more on this.


A video advertising the upcoming Desiring God conference in the US. This is a topic I’ve done some thinking about myself, so I’m looking forward greatly to the subsequent book!

Love is NOT a choice

Is love a choice? Can I decide to love someone or something? Non! Love is not a choice. Love is a way of being. In fact it’s the way of being.

Very helpful thoughts from Dan Hames on what love is. As someone who has told others that “love is a choice!” with “almost the authority of Scripture”, this is a very helpful corrective.

Dear Christian Voter

Posted at 1:24 PM

Dear Conservative voter,

You didn’t quite do it. The Big Society didn’t quite capture the public. You can moan all you want about “the British people decisively defeating Gordon Brown” but he’s still got a constitutional right to try to form the next government. If he succeeds, you’re not going to like it. A progressive agenda; the free speech clause in the religious hatred bill revoked, leaving evangelists and preachers open to prosecution for saying stuff from the Bible; a budget deficit that isn’t being tackled quickly enough; no movement on abortion; parents’ rights to educate their kids constricted, with secular sex education centrally mandated; electoral reform with its potential to keep this coalition going for decades. As Leo McGarry once put it, “You got beat”.

Sure, there were some astounding victories. Reading West was won with a 12% swing; Montgomeryshire with 13%. My old MP, notorious for his liberal views on euthanasia, was beaten by a Christian candidate. There are places you’ve done very well. But there’s a residual fear of the nasty old Tories that has seemingly stopped you from getting the majority you feel the country needed. Some people have been won over by hearing about the work of the Centre for Social Justice; others think you’re still the party of the rich and privileged, and are thanking God that you didn’t get a majority. Okay, so you’ll argue that inheritance tax is unfair as it taxes the same person twice on the same money; you’ll argue that your tax policies keep support for the poorest, and that inequality increased under Labour; you’ll argue that you believe in a more limited form of government (perhaps even with biblical reasons to back you up) and deeply care about the poor. Many Christians aren’t listening to you. For those for whom social justice is a priority, any attempt to cut taxes on the rich (inheritance tax) or increase the burden on the poor (cutting some benefits), or towards an unequal education system where rich parents improve their kids’ schools and the rest get landed with worse ones, will leave them confirmed in their views that you hate the poor and would horrifically damage this country. You need to convince them. I don’t know how.

At the same time, you might be tempted to demonise those Christians who supported the other parties. Don’t. Christians supporting Labour generally do so because they have a passion for social justice and eradicating inequality, an issue where your party’s reputation is (in their eyes) absolutely horrific. Don’t demonise them for promoting a anti-Christian agenda; instead, catch the same passion for the poor. This is where you fall down in your support amongst Christians; keep doing better at it. Show them by your lives that this is something you care about. Christians are called to seek the good of the city – in other words, the common good and not just the protection of Christian freedoms. Some Christians might be happy with a bit less freedom (it’s never stopped the gospel going out before) and fewer poor people. Some might not agree with your perception of the issues. Some might just not know about it. Don’t demonise them.

Don’t demonise the Lib Dems either. Christians voting Lib Dem do so because they’re opposed to war; they want a fairer tax and electoral system; they care for the environment. You might disagree with their solutions, or even think them naïve, but don’t demonise them. Some Lib Dems are militantly secular, but others aren’t, and the party whips far less than the major two. Supporting the Conservatives to them might be seen as restricting debate; a kick in the teeth for poor families; even a vote for Christendom! Re-affirm the Conservatives’ liberal heritage. You do have common ground!

Dear Labour voter,

Well, it’s not as bad as you’d feared, but it’s still your worst loss for many years. As I write, Gordon Brown is still the prime minister. The Tories have the most seats but not enough to win votes without difficulty. You’ve saved the country from stinging cuts that would send us back into recession; you’ve (for the moment) hung onto power, a small victory for the cause of the marginalised and oppressed you seek to help. A future fair for all could still be possible.

It’s still wide open, but if Cameron fails to negotiate something with the Lib Dems, you’ll have defeated his inheritance tax cut. You’ll have defeated the policies that would drain the education budget while creating more sectarianism and inequality in the school system. You’d have succeeded in standing up for the working class whose interests have always been ignored by the Conservatives. The voice of the oppressed is still heard.

But amid all the rhetoric, you too must try not to demonise your opponents. You’ll argue that you have the moral high ground – the Lib Dems are way off on so many things, and the Tories would continue to help the rich at the expense of the poor. You’ll wonder how any Christian could ever vote Conservative: their inheritance tax cuts are immoral, when families are losing their tax credits; marriage is good but no-one will stay married through a measly tax cut – again, it’s merely giving more money to those who need it least; it’s Labour who have invested in schools and hospitals, who have increased international aid so much; governments need to seek social justice – just look what the minor prophets criticised God’s people for! – and the Tories want to undo all of that.

But Conservative voters aren’t all who you think they are, nor are they all making the arguments you think they are. Some truly believe that the Bible has only granted the state a limited role, and so cutting taxes and government services, giving some of them over to communities or charities, is the most moral thing to do. They will also argue (not from the Thatcher era, but from the Bible) that social justice is best achieved through individuals, not the hard hand of government. They care for the poor! However, they’re terribly concerned about the size and power of the state, because of its potential to do harm when it steps beyond the bounds God has given it in Scripture. They are concerned that the trend over the last parliament was to more state interference, including how they bring up their children. They’re concerned that the Conservatives are the only party voting against what they see as authoritarian measures to restrict Christian freedoms. You may not agree that that’s a priority when there’s such great poverty in this country, but I hope you can see where they’re coming from.

The amount of hatred I’ve seen from Christians directed at the Conservatives is the main reason I kept so quiet about my voting intentions for so long. Whatever you think of their policies, please do not demonise the Tories. Some are very possibly as bad as you suspect. Many more aren’t. Many are passionate about seeing poverty eradicated; they want to see individuals, communities and charities get their hands dirty helping people, something of which most Labour supporters I know are in favour, even if you disagree on the role the state has to play. Christian Conservatives – and most Conservatives in general – want to help the poor. Please don’t demonise them!

Dear Liberal Democrat voter,

I’m sorry for your loss. You had a fantastic boost in the polls, but it’s gone nowhere. I know how you must be feeling: in 2005, I was feeling the same thing. The sting of losing seats to the Tories can’t be helped much even by a good showing in Eastbourne amongst other places. But you’re the kingmakers now – Labour and the Conservatives both need your support. You can hopefully achieve some of your aims, maybe even proportional representation – and if that goes through, then next time could be a very different story.

You’ve lost seats, but the Tories haven’t gained enough, so you’ve got more clout in than the last parliament. Times could be changing for you.

You might feel frustrated that other Christians seem blind to Labour’s failures: the promise of PR with no result; the war in Iraq; the growing inequality that Gordon Brown has overseen, leaving the poor worse off; excessive governmental regulation; presiding over an immigration nightmare. You might see the Conservatives as even worse: strongly supporting first-past-the-post; continuously fighting for the rights of the already privileged; not doing what was necessary to oppose Labour’s worst excesses; anti-Europe and borderline racist. I know – a year ago, I’d probably have agreed with you.

Try to understand why other Christians aren’t with you. They’re concerned that your party is immoral – members much more likely to support euthanasia and liberalised abortion; who fought hard to abolish blasphemy laws. It may be unfair to criticise you as the electoral system hasn’t given you a chance at power yet, but particularly at this election, they may have felt they needed more experience in government. Labour voters aren’t sure you’re committed to the poor as much as you say, what with seeking to abolish child tax credits and trust funds. Conservative voters have seen you support exactly the same bills they’re worried about Labour proposing: equality legislation that seems to achieve equality for all but Christians; education decisions that potentially prevent parents from bringing up their children as they choose; opposition to restrictions on abortion. They’re also worried about proportional representation creating a hung parliament every election, preventing government from doing its job properly. You might disagree with them; you might trumpet your party’s record on allowing free votes on moral issues, and party members to suggest party policy, allowing a potential Christian influence if more joined you; but please don’t demonise the Tories for being anti-progressive (their motive is to preserve what is good, even if you disagree on what that is), or Labour for not going far enough with social justice and spending too much (they’d argue that they need to to eradicate inequality).

Dear Christian voter,

There’s currently no clear outcome. You might be frightened that the Tories could still claw back power and set back all the progress of the last 13 years, leaving the poor far worse off; you might be scared of a progressive coalition eroding our Christian freedoms; you might be concerned that Gordon Brown is still hanging on. You have no need to be concerned.

Christian voter, the one who currently reigns over the nations of men is the one who died a sinner’s death to bring you to the Father. Jesus is sovereign; Jesus is Lord. Whatever government is formed in the next few hours or days, this will not change. Whether the next few years see our freedoms eroded or protected, whether the poor get poorer or richer, whatever happens: Jesus is Lord. You don’t need to worry! You can be disappointed, that’s allowed. But Jesus is still Lord.

It’s very tempting for Christians to forget that the ultimate political authority in the world belongs to the one who makes and removes governments according to his sovereign will. In the whirlwind of an election campaign, we can become so impassioned about our party that this drops off the radar. We turn on our brothers and sisters from the other parties without realising it by issuing blanket criticisms. If we remember the true King, how can we do this? Politics is vitally important, but not of ultimate importance. We can argue our cases, and seek the common good for this country and this world, always letting the Bible show us what our priorities should be in this. We can throw ourselves into the world of politics, campaigning, running, lobbying and voting. But when Paul writes “there is no Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, man nor woman, for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28), he could well have added “no blue, red nor yellow”. Wider afield, knowing the grace that has saved us and the common grace that has given many people a passion to see the poor cared for, we cannot be too aggressively critical of our political opponents. We may disagree utterly, but we would be no better were it not for God’s grace at work in our lives. We have no right to feel self-righteous. Far be it from us to boast “except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which the world has been crucified to [us], and [we] to the world” (Galatians 6:14). As we seek to be salt and light in our society, we should be distinctive in this way without exception, whatever our political views.

So as the dust settles and deals are made, we need to remember that whoever is prime minister tomorrow, Jesus is Lord over everything, and to trust him, not our government, for the good of the UK; and we need to remember how much we’ve been saved from so that we can engage in politics in a godly, humble and self-giving way.

The Grove Is On Fire: Before the Election

Mark Walley links to my latest entry with these comments:

[H]ere’s the rule, if you vote Conservative on Thursday because you’re impressed by their language of a bigger society and smaller state, you’ve then got to actually care for the poor, the broken, and the homeless. If you say that it’s not the government’s place to look after these people, but primarily the people’s neighbours, families, and churches and then you, as these people’s neighbours, families, and churches, don’t do it, you are the worst sort of hypocrite.

This is one of the things that has challenged me most about this election. In thinking about the role of the state (and deciding it’s too big), there may well be an aftermath of some people worse off financially. I hope (and Cameron has promised) that this won’t be the most needy in society; nevertheless, if for all my rhetoric about government not being able to solve problems merely through welfare money, I don’t then get out and help – well, as Mark says I’m a hypocrite. How I can best do that remains to be seen, but hopefully as part of a church already doing this stuff I’d be able to figure it out. (This applies whatever the election result: again, if the Conservatives lose and I forget the rhetoric about us all needing to help “fix this broken society”, then I’m still a hypocrite.)

Next → Page 1 of 17