Audience of One is the weblog of Matthew Weston, a UK student, Christian, technophile and musician.

Sticking to a decision (part one)

Approximately eighteen months ago I made a decision. It took a few months for what I’d actually decided to sink in. Try to understand: I’d made a decision because I believed it was the right decision to make. It was almost like a leap of faith, because it took the next few months for me to come to understand better why it was the right decision. It took the experience to show me that I was right. It was an epiphany, if you like.

It then took a good few months thinking about how hard I should try and get my friends to follow in that decision. I’m still making those decisions today as I see friends so close to falling into the traps I fell into, yet apparently managing to stay out of them, like I couldn’t.

Why did I make this decision? My own experiences had taught me the foolishness of what I had been pursuing. Culture clouded my thinking; I couldn’t see the problem though I had felt its effects. I was blinded by my own selfish feelings, and couldn’t see that I was running away from God. With my lips I honoured him; with my life I dishonoured him. Again, with my lips I said that living God’s way was the best way (after all, as our creator who knows better?), but I had not yet come to realise the full extent of what this meant. I couldn’t see what was wrong, because everyone else was doing it, and I couldn’t see another way. It took a sharp shock to snap me out of it, to bring me to my senses, and since my decision (with complete honesty, one of the hardest decisions of my life), I’ve been living in the light of this new knowledge. There is another way, and it’s ultimately much more fulfilling.

As ever, the here and now fight against the eternal. Sticking to the decision in the light of what’s going on now, however much I know how worthwhile what I’m doing will be, is a daily struggle. I’m learning what I should already know from looking at the cross: sacrifice is a major part of love. Silence can be more loving than words. Distance can be more fruitful than intimacy. And God’s sovereign designs are far more intricate, amusing, amazing, fulfilling and satisfying than any pitiful scheme I could cook up. Sticking to my decision now is more than difficult, but the reward – even in this life – is more than I can imagine.

Matthew @ 10:36, June 20, 2005 to Diary | Comments (10)


Comments:

Rory

So what was the decision? Or is this part of the mystery?

Living a pure and holy life is never easy. The path of the righteous is fraught with difficulty.

(Why do I feel so poetic today?)

Comment added at 14:49, June 20, 2005

Matthew

Note the titular parenthetical clause…

(Why do I feel like using long words today?)

Fraught is not poetic – the vowel sound in combination with the “fr” is just ugly.

Comment added at 15:37, June 20, 2005

Sheepie

Which surely makes it poetic as that is relevant to the context.

Comment added at 16:49, June 20, 2005

Matthew

…perhaps.

Comment added at 17:31, June 20, 2005

Mr E

As far as I can tell, the vowel in “fraught” is not a diphthong, but simply an open-mid back vowel, /O/ in SAMPA. Does this merit the term “vowel combination” just because orthographically it contains of two separate “vowels”?

Just being pedantic…

Comment added at 22:54, June 20, 2005

Rory

Erm, dude, he said nothing about the it being a diphthong. Technically, no vowel is a diphthong – they are two separate categories. It’s either a vowel, or a diphthong (or a triphthong, but we won’t go there today). He was saying how the vowel didn’t sound good beside the /fr/ consonant cluster.

Anyway… Matthew, maybe my poetic style hangs on dissonance, on the lack of resonance and assonance… Perhaps it’s arrythmic, and jarring and confusion. I call it Neo-Modernist Massimoism.

Comment added at 00:19, June 21, 2005

Matthew

In which case, fair enough. I just usually go for the definition “characterized by romantic imagery” when poetic is used in such a context.

(:

Comment added at 09:13, June 21, 2005

Mr E

Sorry. I misread Matthew’s statement and didn’t see the “in”. I thought he’d said “…the vowel combination with the “fr” is just ugly.”, and thought he was using “vowel combination” as one entity.

Comment added at 18:14, June 21, 2005

Sheepie

See Rory said what I said only more poetically.

Comment added at 22:01, June 21, 2005

Rory

Em, yeah, whatever. I just make stuff up and sometimes it makes sense.

Comment added at 02:11, June 22, 2005

Post a comment:

Most XHTML auto-generated via Markdown. Email addresses are required but will never be displayed. If you have a website (or want to link to someone else's) please enter it in the URL field. Otherwise, leave this blank.

If you have a TypeKey identity, you can sign in to use it here.


Remember information?